Go to Top

Integration & Diversity

About our integration and diversity programme

MPG’s Integration and Diversity programme is committed to promoting an environment where diversity is recognised and valued. Migrants are entering societies which are themselves changing and becoming more diverse.

The Integration and Diversity programme is aimed at:

  • Promoting effective diversity strategies
  • Removing integration obstacles
  • Promoting active citizenship
  • Enhancing the capacity of stakeholders

In a strategic approach to diversity, the responsiveness of mainstream institutions and organisations to the challenges and advantages of Europe’s diverse populations is key. Responsiveness means meeting the challenge of providing products and services that reflect the diversity of society, and harnessing the full potential of that diversity to contribute to socio-economic arrangements and processes.

A citizens-centred approach offering multiple pathways to citizenship, leading ultimately to the acquisition of nationality, encourages active participation in society as well as increasing openness among the general public enabling all members of society to shape the shared future of a diverse society.

Tools include:

  • Peer review
  • Handbooks
  • Indicators
  • Benchmarking methods

highlighted projects

Panel Meeting on Family Reunification – Tbilissi (Georgia) – 26 & 27 November 2015

easternAt this event organised by the European Commission, the IOM and the Swedish migration Agency, MPG’s Associate Policy Anallyste Zvezda Vankova will give a general presentation of family reunification for third-country nationals in EU law, discuss the new Guidelines published by the European Commission. Zvezda will draw examples from the Migrant Integration Policy Index, MPG’s project on family reunification, as well as a recent event organised by the European NGO Platform on Asylum and Migration.

Learning from Others and its Limits – 24-25 November 2015 – Hannover (Germany)

SVRThomas Huddleston and Jan Niessen will explain MIPEX as a comparison tool for migration research. In the recently published sixth Annual Report, the Expert Council of German Foundations on Integration and Migration (SVR) systematically compares Germany’s migration and integration policies to the policies mainly of countries perceived to be particularly successful and therefore considered migration and integration policy role models by the public (Canada, USA and Sweden as well as other European countries).

The comparison leads to two central insights: for one, it shows that Germany has by now entered into the ranks of progressive immigration countries. It has clearly caught up conceptually in its migration management and promotion of integration and stands the comparison with classic immigration countries – especially in the field of labour migration policies. Moreover, it can be established that many provisions of migration and integration policy show an international convergence development. On the other hand, analyses show deficits and omissions of German and European policies, for example the lack of an outward and inward bound overall plan for migration policies, the urgent need for reform of citizenship policy and the necessity to reform the common European asylum system.

For more information on the event, click here.


diversity and integration work in use

Integration of migrants in Europe: the need for a pro-active, sustainable and global policy

CoE_PAA report  prepared for the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the integration of migrants in Europe calls for a proactive, sustainable and global policy. The rapporteur, Marietta Karamanli from France, looks in particular at the labour market, education, political participation and anti-discrimination and uses extensively our Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX) as well as statistical data to describe the current situation. She is making proposals which would improve policies and countries’ MIPEX scores.

EPAM Position on Family Reunion Reflected in New Commission Guidelines

family-reunion-summaryIn April 2014 the Commission published long awaited Guidance for application of the Family Reunification Directive for Member States.  The Guidelines are the result of a consultation procedure initiated by the Commission’s Green Paper on the Right to Family Reunion.  As chair of the Migration sub-group of the European NGO Platform on Asylum and Migration (EPAM), MPG played an active role in this consultation procedure.  EPAM’s NGOs worked together to present a strong unified message at the EC’s public hearing, a common statement signed by 75 EU and national NGOs, and a contribution to the EC’s preparation of the Guidelines.  MPG also drafted four policy briefs to help policy makers and other stakeholders reply to the Green Paper.  As a result, the EC’s guidelines have drawn heavily from NGOs’ contributions.

These guidelines can be used to ramp up enforcement through policy changes initiated by national governments, through infringement proceedings initiated by the EC, and through national court cases and requests for a preliminary reference to the ECJ.  They mark a shift of focus in EU cooperation from law-making at EU level to proper implementation and monitoring at national level.  Consequently, EPAM members have seized this opportunity to organise an NGO expert conference  on 19 and 20 May 2014 to identify better ways for more systemic information gathering and advocacy cooperation among NGOs across the EU, which may lead to better enforcement of the right to family reunion for third country nationals.

diversity and integration Work in Context

Germany: CDU goes multicultural

Credits: @picture-alliance/dpa | Deutsche Welle

Credits: @picture-alliance/dpa | Deutsche Welle

Germany’s Christian Democrats want more diversity and believe more Muslims in their party will make the Union more open. A Deutsche Welle columnist believes that “the CDU should strive for openness as Germany’s biggest political party“. He observes that “the Greens have a chairman called Özdemir, the Social Democrats a general secretary called Fahimi – now the Christian Democrats want to open up as well. From now on, multiculturalism will no longer be something that has been imposed upon them by the political left. The CDU wants to present itself as ethnically mixed, too. This is a cultural revolution – or a mini-revolution, at the very least“.

MPG’s Diversity Assessment Tool, developed in the framework of the project Diversity in Political Parties’ Programmes, Organisation and Representation (DivPol) is designed to assess to what extent political parties adopt measures to integrate people with an immigrant background into the life of the party. Parties are organisations that are to a greater or lesser extent professional organisations operating at local, regional, national and European levels. In order to achieve their overall goals, parties aim to:

  • seek the support of voters
  • recruit members
  • select candidates for representative office
  • select leaders
  • employ staff
  • purchase goods and services.

As part of a broader strategy to achieve these goals, parties can adopt and implement equal opportunity, anti-discrimination and diversity principles. This would make parties more representative and effective to mobilise the population. The tool is primarily meant for the national level where general rules are set for the party as a whole. However, the tool can also be used for party operations at sub-national level and by party affiliated organisations such as training institutes.

For the design of the tool we made use of a compendium of benchmarks and indicators on diversity in political parties.

MPG partner digs deeper into discriminatory effects of Spanish naturalisation laws

Migrants' Telephone Call Centre, Roquetas de Mar, Almería, January 2004. Credits: John Perivolaris | flickr

Migrants’ Telephone Call Centre, Roquetas de Mar, Almería, January 2004. Credits: John Perivolaris | flickr

Building on the ACIT (http://eudo-citizenship.eu/about/acit) project, MPG’s Spanish partner CIDOB (link) will conduct focus groups and in-depth interviews to analyse the discriminatory effect of Spain’s different naturalisation procedures for immigrants coming from countries with historical ties to Spain (largely Spanish-speaking countries) and for immigrants coming from the rest of the world. The different legal procedures and the administrative difficulties for immigrants from the rest of the world were analysed in the ACIT project, leading to a Handbook for Spain available in English and in Spanish. Also the Spanish results of the Immigrant Citizens Survey (www.immigrantsurvey.org) launched in Spain by CIDOB, suggest that immigrants from the rest of the world are less likely to naturalise (http://www.immigrantsurvey.org/downloads/Immigrant%20citizens%20survey%20-%20Questionnaire%20-%20Online%20Version.pdf), even after 20 years’ residence in Spain, and twice as likely to report administrative problems during the naturalisation procedure

Read more…


diversity and integration Events


LATEST PRODUCTS IN THIS PROGRAMME

Browse all diversity and integration publications